AdD Tech
AdD TECH — SYSTEMS, DATA AND COMPLIANCE
Technology you can actually operate
Compliance that holds up. Processes that run themselves. For companies growing across borders with a team that isn’t growing at the same speed.
Complexity has always been the tax on growing across borders. Now it has a calendar. Four European regulations — the AI Act, GDPR, the Data Act and the Cyber Resilience Act — land on the same software, the same data and the same company, on different dates, with different obligations and different people responsible.
Most companies find this out the week a customer asks them to prove it.
In Europe, the gatekeeper is no longer just the regulator. It is your customer’s procurement team.
The deadline moved. The work didn’t get smaller.
In July 2026 the Digital Omnibus pushed the AI Act’s high-risk obligations from August 2026 to December 2027, and to August 2028 for AI built into products. Plenty of suppliers have not updated their pitch. We have.
What did not move: transparency obligations have applied since 2 August 2026. The Cyber Resilience Act’s reporting duty starts on 11 September 2026. The Data Act’s access-by-design rules start on 12 September 2026.
And the amendment did not only push things back. It added two prohibitions, and those apply from 2 December 2026 — the same day the marking grace period ends. Reading only the headline is how a company ends up relaxed about the wrong date.
You now have fifteen months where you expected four. That is not a reason to wait. It is the only chance you will get to do this calmly, once, and properly.
Three steps. In this order.
Assess
Find out what actually reaches you, and what to do about it. Not a report — a plan with owners and dates.
Automate
Build the systems that carry the work, compliant from the first line rather than corrected afterwards.
Keep it current
The rules move. Someone should be watching them so you don’t have to.
START HERE
Two ways in. Start with the free one.
STEP ONE · FREE
The twelve-question check
Twelve questions about what you sell, what your team uses and where your data sits. You get a provisional read straight back: which of the four regulations reach you, which date is nearest, and the two things twelve questions cannot settle. Five minutes, and it costs you an email address.
It is provisional on purpose. It tells you whether you have a problem. It does not tell you what to do about it.
STEP TWO · FIXED PRICE
EU Digital Readiness Check
Credited in full against your assessment if you go ahead within 60 days.
You send us a short intake: the AI tools your team actually uses, what you sell into the EU, where your data sits, and whether any of your products connect to the internet or collect usage data. Within seven working days you get three documents, and forty-five minutes with the person who wrote them.
You get the exact date when you book, and we hold the forty-five minutes then too — no chasing a calendar afterwards. If we are ever going to miss that date, you hear it before the date, not after.
- Your obligations, dated. Which of the four regulations reach you, which articles, and every date that applies to your business — from the same table we keep current further down this page.
- Your systems register. What AI and what data you run, written down once, in the form the regulations will keep asking for.
- Your supplier answer sheet. The AI and data questions arriving in customer procurement questionnaires — what AI you use and what for, whether you are a provider or a deployer, where data is processed, how fast you report an incident, what policy your staff work under — on one page, answered, ready to send. Where you can’t answer honestly yet, it says so. Those blanks are your scope of work, in your own words rather than ours.
What it is not. It is not the assessment, and the answer sheet is not a certificate. Both are built from what you tell us, both are dated, and both say so on the page. They give you the size and the shape of the job before you commit to it — which is exactly what most companies are missing when they ask for a quote.
Seven working days. Credited in full against your assessment if you go ahead.
Assess
EU Digital Compliance Assessment
Credited in full against your assessment if you go ahead within 60 days.
AI ACT · GDPR · DATA ACT · CYBER RESILIENCE ACT
Compliance usually arrives one regulation at a time, from one adviser at a time, and never adds up to a single answer. We do it once, across all four, and hand back a plan with names and dates on it instead of a report with findings in it.
Four regulations in one pass is not four times the work. The same inventory, the same data map and the same conversations feed all of them — which is why this costs less than four separate engagements, lands sooner, and produces four positions that agree with each other.
What you get
- A data flow map and processing inventory, covering your software and your cloud service
- A GDPR position: roles, lawful basis, international transfers, and whether you need an Article 27 representative
- A Data Act applicability assessment — whether machine-generated data falls in scope, and what access-by-design attaches to it
- A Cyber Resilience Act vulnerability handling and incident notification procedure — 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, 14-day final report — ready to adopt
- An AI Act position: your AI systems inventory, whether you are a provider or a deployer, Article 5 screening, the Article 50 transparency obligations that already apply, and what your general-purpose AI suppliers owe you
- A prioritised remediation plan with owners and target dates
Implementation support while you work through it
- A findings session with your management team, so the plan survives contact with the people who have to run it
Who it is for. Companies selling software, connected products or data-driven services into the EU — or preparing to.
Automate
We automate it. You reduce the workload.
Running three countries with the team you hired for one is where small companies break. Not because the work is hard, but because it multiplies: the same report in three formats, the same question in three languages, the same document chasing three signatures.
What we build
- Country-level reporting that assembles itself
- Multilingual customer and support flows
- Document and approval flows between entities
- Onboarding that runs without a person in the
- middle
You now have fifteen months where you expected four. That is not a reason to wait. It is the only chance you will get to do this calmly, once, and properly.
- Diagnose. We sit with the people doing the work and follow the process as it actually runs, not as the manual describes it.
- Define. You get the scope in writing before anything is built: what gets automated, what deliberately does not, what it will measure, and a fixed price. Nothing starts until you have signed that page.
- Build. In working increments you can see and stop. Compliant from the first line, not corrected afterwards.
- Hand over. Training for the team that will run it, and the measured before and after.
Keep it current
The rules moved twice in eighteen months. They will move again.
What applies, and when
| Obligation | Applies from | Status |
|---|---|---|
| AI Act — prohibited practices (Art. 5) | 2 February 2025 | In force |
| AI Act — AI literacy (Art. 4) | 2 February 2025 | In force, rewritten July 2026 |
| AI Act — general-purpose AI | 2 August 2025 | In force |
| AI Act — transparency (Art. 50) | 2 August 2026 | In force |
| Cyber Resilience Act — reporting | 11 September 2026 | In force |
| Data Act — access by design (Art. 3(1)) | 12 September 2026 | In force |
| AI Act — prohibited practices, new categories (Art. 5) | 2 December 2026 | Next |
| AI Act — marking of generative systems already on the market | 2 December 2026 | Grace period ends |
| AI Act — high-risk, standalone (Annex III) | 2 December 2027 | Deferred from August 2026 |
| AI Act — high-risk, embedded in products (Annex I) | 2 August 2028 | Deferred from August 2027 |
Questions people actually ask
Are you a law firm?
We only use ChatGPT and a chatbot on our website. Does any of this reach us?
How long does an assessment take?
What happens if the deadlines move again
Which languages do you work in?
We think our problem is how the work is organised, not our systems. Are we in the wrong place?
We are not selling abroad. Is this still for us?
Complexity is a choice. Clarity is a decision you can make this week.